Should the Indo-Pacific embrace a NATO-style alliance?

Arguments both for and against

The Indo-Pacific, once viewed as a maritime stretch of dispersed islands and emerging economies, is now increasingly regarded as the theatre of great powers’ contestation. Much of this shift is owed to China’s growing military, economic, and diplomatic clout.

Against this backdrop, the idea of a NATO-style alliance in the Indo-Pacific has gained traction. US Assistant Secretary of Defence for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs Ely Ratner’s recent proposal for a Pacific Defence Pact, a formal, treaty-bound alliance among the USA, Japan, Australia, and the Philippines, has revived the debate over whether the region requires a collective defence architecture akin to what emerged in post-war Europe.

There is no question that the strategic environment in the region has shifted. Bilateral arrangements, such as the US-Japan alliance or the US-Australia partnership, have deepened. Minilateral formats like AUKUS and the Quad have also emerged, signalling a willingness among like-minded states to cooperate more closely on defence and security. Yet, none of these mechanisms offers the kind of mutual defence commitment that NATO’s Article 5 provides.

Even so, a NATO-style alliance in the Indo-Pacific faces several obstacles. One of the most fundamental issues is the diversity of political systems, security outlooks, and threat perceptions across the region. For example, for Tokyo, Beijing’s increased presence around the Senkaku Islands is an immediate concern. For Canberra, the focus is broader, encompassing cyber threats, political interference, and China’s influence in the South Pacific. Manila, after years of policy swings, is only now reasserting its maritime rights. Washington, for its part, sees Taiwan as a central concern. In short, the threat is not universally perceived, and this complicates any effort to establish a collective defence mechanism with clear redlines and binding obligations.

Furthermore, the credibility of any collective defence arrangement would come under immediate scrutiny. It is not at all obvious that all members of a hypothetical alliance would be willing or politically able to respond militarily to a contingency involving Taiwan or other disputed maritime territories. The ambiguity surrounding who would act, when, and under what conditions could ultimately undermine the very deterrent value that such an alliance seeks to establish.

Additionally, NATO itself is showing signs of strategic fatigue. Disagreements over burden-sharing persist, and Europe remains uneasy about the reliability of US support in Ukraine. With the re-emergence of Trump-era scepticism towards alliances, it is difficult to imagine Washington committing to a new security framework of comparable scale in the Indo-Pacific.

The Indo-Pacific does not need a replica of NATO; it needs a security architecture that reflects its unique geopolitical realities. Formal alliances may signal strength, but in this region, they risk entrenching divisions and triggering counterbalancing. Strategic fluidity, not rigid blocs, is what keeps the region stable. Any effort to impose a fixed order must reckon with the costs of undermining the very balance it seeks to preserve.

Moreover, a formal alliance could provoke the very behaviour it seeks to deter. Beijing already views efforts like AUKUS and the Quad as part of a containment strategy. Moving towards a treaty-bound alliance would likely confirm that perception, potentially accelerating China’s military modernisation or prompting it to act pre-emptively before such an alliance is fully operational.

There is also the matter of regional buy-in. Southeast Asian states have consistently resisted bloc politics, preferring instead to hedge, balance, or bandwagon depending on circumstances. For many of them, being forced to choose sides would be unwelcome and possibly destabilising. Therefore, strategic choices in the ASEAN are not divorced from economics. The USA and China remain commercially intertwined, and key US allies, including Japan, Australia, and the Philippines, rely heavily on trade with Beijing, which inevitably tempers robust security alignment.

Furthermore, NATO’s focus on military solutions has often delivered mixed results, as seen in Afghanistan and Libya. Yet that same mindset is now being projected onto the Indo-Pacific, where it risks crowding out political solutions and ignoring urgent regional needs like infrastructure, climate resilience, and digital governance. As the region becomes more securitised, space for inclusive development also shrinks.

Though not a direct actor in the Indo-Pacific alliance web, Pakistan is deeply tied to China and increasingly linked to regional maritime trade and connectivity through CPEC. Any hardening of alliance politics could deepen its strategic alignment with Beijing, while also limiting space for independent diplomacy. Pakistan should maintain a balanced stance, avoiding entanglement in conflicts that could compromise its foreign policy. Therefore, from Pakistan’s standpoint, the securitisation of the Indo-Pacific through the alliance model is both unnecessary and destabilising.

India is another major Indo-Pacific power with growing regional ambitions, and any move towards a formal alliance will bring India’s role under scrutiny, which is already finding it hard to maintain its self-claimed strategic flexibility. No matter on which side of such an alliance India stands, it will have consequences for the region, particularly Pakistan. Following the events of 6–10 May, it is important to critically assess India’s military capability, which has come under scrutiny. Even if they have strategic flexibility, their strategic capability remains limited.

The Indo-Pacific does not need a replica of NATO; it needs a security architecture that reflects its unique geopolitical realities. Formal alliances may signal strength, but in this region, they risk entrenching divisions and triggering counterbalancing. Strategic fluidity, not rigid blocs, is what keeps the region stable. Any effort to impose a fixed order must reckon with the costs of undermining the very balance it seeks to preserve.

Faiza
Faiza
Faiza Abid is a researcher at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS), Lahore. She can be reached at [email protected]

40 COMMENTS

  1. I’m also commenting to make you be aware of what a perfect discovery my friend’s princess obtained checking the blog. She mastered so many pieces, most notably what it’s like to possess an ideal giving character to make men and women completely grasp specific advanced matters. You actually surpassed people’s desires. I appreciate you for imparting those beneficial, dependable, edifying as well as fun guidance on your topic to Julie.

  2. hello!,I like your writing very much! share we communicate more about your post on AOL? I require an expert on this area to solve my problem. Maybe that’s you! Looking forward to see you.

  3. of course like your web-site but you need to test the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling issues and I in finding it very troublesome to inform the reality however I will surely come again again.

  4. Nice post. I be taught one thing tougher on different blogs everyday. It is going to all the time be stimulating to read content from other writers and follow a little one thing from their store. I’d favor to use some with the content material on my weblog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a hyperlink in your net blog. Thanks for sharing.

  5. Do you have a spam problem on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; many of us have created some nice procedures and we are looking to swap solutions with others, be sure to shoot me an email if interested.

  6. Hello there, I discovered your web site by way of Google at the same time as searching for a related matter, your website got here up, it appears to be like good. I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

  7. hello!,I really like your writing so so much! share we communicate extra about your article on AOL? I need an expert in this house to resolve my problem. May be that is you! Taking a look ahead to look you.

  8. Thank you for all of the work on this site. My daughter loves working on internet research and it’s really simple to grasp why. My spouse and i hear all concerning the compelling form you create worthwhile steps via the website and therefore improve participation from website visitors about this matter plus our daughter has always been becoming educated so much. Take advantage of the rest of the year. You’re carrying out a really great job.

  9. I’m not sure where you are getting your info, but great topic. I must spend some time finding out much more or working out more. Thank you for excellent info I used to be looking for this info for my mission.

  10. Hello, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam feedback? If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or anything you can advise? I get so much lately it’s driving me insane so any support is very much appreciated.

  11. I keep listening to the newscast speak about getting free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the best site to get one. Could you advise me please, where could i find some?

  12. Magnificent items from you, man. I have have in mind your stuff previous to and you’re simply extremely fantastic. I really like what you’ve obtained here, certainly like what you are stating and the best way in which you are saying it. You are making it enjoyable and you continue to care for to stay it smart. I can not wait to read far more from you. That is actually a tremendous web site.

  13. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an nervousness over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this hike.

  14. Hello there! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could find a captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having problems finding one? Thanks a lot!

Leave a Reply to jalalive Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

Justice Jahangiri resumes duties as SC annuls IHC’s interim order

Constitutional bench ruling says a judge can’t be restrained from work through interim order ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court set aside an interim order of...