No foreign hand involved in my ouster, says Sheikh Hasina

DHAKA: Former Bangladesh prime minister Sheikh Hasina has dismissed suggestions that the United States played an active role in supporting groups that sought her removal from power under the pretext of “restoring democracy.”

In an interview with Indian TV channel CNN, Hasina said Bangladesh has maintained “good relationships with successive US administrations” and that there is “no reason to believe” Washington or other foreign powers were directly involved in the country’s political developments.

Though she acknowledged that the country’s interim leader, economist Muhammad Yunus, had built a network of influential supporters in the West, Hasina said many of those admirers had mistaken his economic reputation for democratic credibility.

“While Yunus has cultivated a network of influential Western admirers from his work as an economist, those who admired him mistook his economic theories for democratic credentials. Now, this illusion is fading, and those admirers are increasingly seeing him for what he is: an unelected head of state who has placed radical extremists in his cabinet, dismantled Bangladesh’s constitution, and stood silent while minorities have been oppressed,” she said.

Hasina also said US President Donald Trump, with whom she said she had “very good relations,” had publicly expressed his dislike of Yunus.

The ex-PM added, “If Westerners think Yunus is a friendly face, they are being fooled. In fact, he is being used as the frontman by the extremists in his administration, who are pursuing a sectarian, score-settling, and socially regressive domestic agenda.”

Hasina further challenged Yunus’s democratic credentials, noting his lack of an electoral mandate and his administration’s decision to bar the Awami League—a party she stated is “supported by millions and which has been elected nine times in the past”—from the upcoming election.

In her first such detailed conversation since leaving Dhaka, Hasina offers a searing account of the events that led to her ouster and the rise of Muhammad Yunus.

Hasina described an “orchestrated coup” masked as reform, implicating radical factions and warning of a growing extremist influence under the current regime. She defended her record, denied Western involvement in her ouster, and thanked India for sanctuary and patience.

When asked as to how far was Army Chief General Waker-uz-Zaman was involved in negotiating your exit, Hasina said the military was faced with an impossible situation: defending a constitutional government against overwhelming mob violence while avoiding any further loss of life. Our discussions focused on preventing a complete breakdown in law and order and ensuring the safety of my family and staff and of ordinary civilians on the streets of Dhaka.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

Cabinet greenlights key amendments to ‘reconcile’ defence laws with 27th Amend

Federal cabinet with PM in chair approves major amendments to Army, Air Force and Navy Acts New office of Chief of Defence Forces...

A double-barrelled change