It is no surprise that Pakistan has secured a $7 billion Extended Fund Facility from the IMF— a lifeline for a government staggering under debt repayments, dwindling reserves, and a suffocating fiscal deficit. On paper, this appears to be salvation. In reality, the IMF’s own Governance and Corruption Diagnostic Report (November 2025) makes clear that the country’s economic malaise is not simply about liquidity. It is about capture.
Analytically, the report is blunt: corruption in Pakistan is described as “persistent and widespread.” This is notably candid, departing from the usual language of polite diplomacy. It describes a system where governance has been hollowed out, institutions serve the connected instead of the citizen, and resources— whether borrowed or earned— disappear into inefficiency and rent-seeking.
The IMF has publicly stated what Pakistanis have long known: the core problem is not the absence of funds and resources, but the presence of a rigged state. This, economic and governance experts argue, is a formal indictment.
The report contains bitter facts . The report’s section related to “State Dominance” is derogatory. Pakistan’s economy is not merely inefficient; it is engineered to privilege insiders, especially those who are considered sacred goats . For decades , the State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), many of them loss-making, continue to drain public resources while shielding themselves from accountability. The Regulatory frameworks are opaque, designed less to facilitate competition than to entrench monopolies for “privileged actors.”
As per the report , th,is is not accidental but systemic since the system has consistently resisted checks and balances from the regulatory framework. Usually,when SOEs operate without transparency, when licences and tariffs are manipulated to favor the few influentials , the result is not just inefficiency— it is exclusion or, more literally, exemption from legal actions . The common citizens pay higher prices for electricity, gas, and transport, while politically connected firms thrive under protectionist umbrellas, bypassing all the legal formalities.
One will be shocked to know that the language used by the IMF on “state capture” is critical here, as revealed by the report . Pakistan’s governance problem is not about weak institutions alone; it is about institutions weaponized to serve narrow interests that hold the power . In such a system, reform is not resisted passively— it is actively sabotaged, and the practice is decades old .
As regards the taxation system , the report’s shocking findings on taxation expose the heart of Pakistan’s fiscal crisis due to systemic failure . The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) operative procedure is “considerable authority and limited oversight,” presiding over a tax system that is very “complex and opaque.” According to the IMF, Pakistan faces serious corruption and governance challenges, with weaknesses in fiscal governance and market regulation contributing to problems such as smuggling and under-invoicing in customs administration.
This is all because of the tax-to-GDP ratio that shockingly remains the lowest in the region. The budget cannot be fixed when the revenue authority itself is compromised or plagued by rampant corruption . The government cannot build fiscal space when the system is designed to leak or has loopholes caused by incompetence and graft.
While essential, the EFF is insufficient. The facility will be viewed as another lost opportunity rather than a turning point if full and sequential change is not implemented, along with credible progress on taxation, the rule of law, and anti-corruption. The rot beneath the economy is governance. Unless Pakistan confronts it, the bandage will peel away, and the wound will deepen.
For common Pakistani people, this means a paradox where the state demands more in indirect taxes: increased costs for fuel, electricity, and everyday consumption items, while failing to effectively tax the wealthy and politically connected. It is often public sector employees who contribute the maximum chunk of tax revenue. The burden shifts downward, eroding trust in the very idea of fair taxation.
Imagine a typical household in Karachi: the head of the family works as a schoolteacher and the main breadwinner, struggling to make ends meet. Each month, the family allocates a sizeable portion of its income to taxes embedded in utility bills and prices of daily commodities. When electricity tariffs rise due to the inefficiencies of State-Owned Enterprises, the family’s budget is strained, forcing cuts on essentials like education and healthcare— decisions that have long-term impacts on their children’s futures.
For investors, it is clear that there is no ease of doing business in Pakistan. The message is equally corrosive. Business firms, especially multinational concerns, perceive Pakistan’s fiscal system not as a framework for growth, but as a mechanism for extraction. This environment is really alarming, prompting multinational firms to reconsider their investments or leave the country.
The IMF report is also an eyeopener for the Judiciary as it is perceived as corrupt, fragmented, and clogged with backlogs when people wait years, even generations, for the final verdict . Contract enforcement is relatively weak, property rights are also insecure, and the judicial decisions are often influenced by political or financial pressure. After the 26th and 27th Amendments , the judiciary has been enfeebled by the political elite . The responsibility is liable for accountability, but amendments protect the rulers with complete impunity. The judiciary is divided, and justice is shattered .
For Pakistanis, with no surprise, it is not a technical problem—it is an existential threat . Foreign direct investment cannot flow into a country where contracts are unenforceable and property can be seized without remedy. Domestic entrepreneurship cannot thrive in a situation when disputes drag on for years in courts seen as compromised.
The rule of law seems to be an abstract principle, though it is the foundation of markets for safety and security or peace of mind . Without it, Pakistan’s economy is not simply inefficient— it is uninvestable.
Conceivably, the most sobering section of the report is its analysis of anti-corruption institutions. The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) are described as politically influenced, uncoordinated, and lacking credibility.
The report also raises the hardest question: can these institutions that are accused of benefiting from the status quo be trusted to dismantle it? When anti-graft agencies are weaponized against political opponents rather than systemic corruption, reform becomes a theatre or a distant dream .
The IMF calls for “comprehensive and sequenced reform,” which seems to be a distant dream given the existing hybrid setup. But reform requires agents of change. If the NAB and FIA are compromised, if the judiciary is distrusted, if the FBR is opaque, then who will implement reform? The danger is crystal clear: Pakistan risks entering yet another cycle where funds are disbursed, conditions are promised, and structural change is deferred due to the strong political elite .
For the average Pakistani, the implications are stark. The $7 billion EFF may stabilize reserves temporarily, but it will not lower electricity bills distorted by SOE inefficiency, as the power tariffs will go up or even experience elastic inflation. It will not fix a tax system that punishes consumption while rewarding evasion. It will not unclog courts where justice is delayed and denied.
For global investors, the message is equally sobering. Pakistan is not merely a high-risk market; it is a captured state. Without visible progress on governance, the EFF is not a bridge to reform— it is a bandage on a wound that continues to fester.
The IMF report ends with a call for “concrete and visible progress” to restore public trust. That phrase should be read not as technocratic jargon but as a warning. Pakistan’s crisis is not only economic; it is existential.
A state that cannot tax fairly, adjudicate disputes credibly, or regulate transparently, cannot sustain itself. A society where corruption is “persistent and widespread” cannot build legitimacy. An economy where capture is systemic cannot grow inclusively.
The $7 billion lifeline buys time. But time without reform is wasted. The choice before Pakistan is stark: dismantle the governance trap, or remain trapped in cycles of bailout and breakdown.
Pakistan’s governance crisis is not new. What is new is the IMF’s willingness to diagnose it openly. By naming corruption as “persistent and widespread,” by identifying state capture as systemic, the report strips away the illusion that money alone can fix the problem.
While essential, the EFF is insufficient. The facility will be viewed as another lost opportunity rather than a turning point if full and sequential change is not implemented, along with credible progress on taxation, the rule of law, and anti-corruption. The rot beneath the economy is governance. Unless Pakistan confronts it, the bandage will peel away, and the wound will deepen.
