White House divided over strategy as Trump faces challenges in Iran war

Washington: A complex internal struggle is unfolding within the White House as US President Donald Trump’s advisers debate the direction of the ongoing conflict with Iran, according to interviews with a Trump adviser and others close to the administration's deliberations.

Nearly two weeks after the United States, in coordination with Israel, launched military operations against Iran, President Trump’s public statements on the war have shifted, reflecting differing opinions among his aides. Some officials and advisers have cautioned the president that rising gasoline prices could have political consequences, while others, described as hawks, are urging Trump to continue the offensive against Iran.

These internal discussions, as reported in interviews conducted by Reuters, provide new insight into the decision-making process inside the White House as it navigates the largest US military operation since the 2003 Iraq war. The behind-the-scenes maneuvering highlights the significant stakes for President Trump, who returned to office last year with a pledge to avoid what he called “stupid military interventions.”

As the conflict continues to spread across the Middle East, the administration is confronted with the challenge of determining when and how to declare victory. The debate among Trump’s advisers centers on balancing military objectives with potential domestic repercussions, particularly the impact of higher fuel prices on American consumers.

According to individuals familiar with the situation, the president is receiving conflicting advice from his team. Some are warning that the economic fallout from the conflict could undermine public support, while others believe that maintaining pressure on Iran is necessary to achieve US strategic goals in the region.

The ongoing discussions underscore the uncertainty surrounding the future course of the Iran war, as President Trump and his advisers weigh both political and military considerations in shaping US policy.