Spreading disinformation about CPEC

A crucial project for Pakistan viewed as a threat by its enemies

When during the regime of President Gen. Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan initiated the construction of Gwadar deep-seaport in Balochistan province in March 2002 with Chinese assistance, sirens went off in the capitals of some European countries, especially the US, India and Israel which took it as a threat to their global and regional plans.

In this respect, China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) which is part of China’s One Belt, One Road (OBOR) or China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is rapidly developing. CPEC will prove to be a gateway to prosperity for both countries as well as the region. Under the project, China is investing as much as $62 billion in various sectors in Pakistan in a phased manner.

The Executive Committee of the National Economic Council (ECNEC) on August 5, last year approved the up-gradation of existing Mainline-1 (ML-1), the 1,872 kilometer railway project from Peshawar to Karachi.

Under the project, the existing 2,655 kilometer track would be upgraded, while the speed of passenger trains would increase. The project would be completed by June 2023.

Besides, under CPEC, energy projects have already made progress.

In fact, CPEC will open new doors of development relating to various fields, as the national economy of the country will grow fast, leading to creation of new job opportunities, poverty reduction, and development of transportation sector—boost agricultural and industrial growth, including exports.

The establishment of CPEC between deep Gwadar seaport of Balochistan and the historic Silk Road city in Western regions-Xinjiang of China will connect Gilgit-Baltistan through Khunjerab Pass, while the roads infrastructure in Gwadar would link the communication network of rest of the country to facilitate transportation of goods.

In May, 2020, the outgoing US Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia, Alice Wells, who tried to spoil China-Pakistan relations, had once again criticized BRI and CPEC by saying that the US was concerned about CPEC projects due to the unfair rates of profits that are guaranteed to Chinese firms. The Chinese Embassy called her statement totally baseless by stating: “We take Pakistan as an equal partner and never asked Pakistan to do more.”

When Gwadar seaport becomes fully operational, it would connect the landlocked Central Asian states with rest of the world. Being the commercial hub, the port is likely to increase volume of trade, bringing multiple economic and financial benefits to Pakistan. It will enable high-volume cargo vessels to move in the major oceans, giving China’s short and easy access to the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean.

Notably, India was openly opposing the CPEC and China’s OBOR or BRI; the US also joined New Delhi. In this regard, on October 3, 2017, the then US Defence Secretary James Mattis told the Lawmakers, “The United States has reiterated its support for India’s opposition to China’s One Belt, One Road initiative…the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) a part of which traverses Pakistan-Kashmir.”

Both Islamabad and Beijing rejected Mattis’ statement and reminded that Washington had also participated in an OBOR summit—the OBOR plan which was also backed by the United Nations—CPEC was an economic cooperation initiative.

In May, 2020, the outgoing US Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia, Alice Wells, who tried to spoil China-Pakistan relations, had once again criticized BRI and CPEC by saying that the US was concerned about CPEC projects due to the unfair rates of profits that are guaranteed to Chinese firms. The Chinese Embassy called her statement totally baseless by stating: “We take Pakistan as an equal partner and never asked Pakistan to do more.”

Following American anti-China and anti-Pakistan approach, India and some Western countries and their media have started spreading disinformation about the CPEC. They are also utilizing some social media platforms-fake websites for this purpose.

For instance, in a recent blog on a website, the writer distorted the facts and wrote: “China halted CPEC projects…due to political fragility, increased interference of security agencies and the army establishment.”

Taking cognizance of foreign entities’ hostile propaganda, the Chairman of the CPEC authority Lt. Gen. (R) Asim Saleem Bajwa on August 23, last year, appealed the general public to ignore disinformation of all fake news and stories regarding the CPEC.

The Chinese Consul General in Karachi, Li Bijian also stated: “China-Pakistan Economic Corridor will continue to grow and expand despite the negative propaganda by certain countries as it is flagship project of “One Belt and One Road Initiative” of China.”

Nonetheless, the Chinese government has, repeatedly, dismissed the criticism as a Western propaganda and insisted that the CPEC will equally benefit Pakistan.

While, Gwadar seaport project which is backbone of the CPEC will uplift the impoverished people of Balochistan and Gilgit-Baltistan, including developments in other backward areas by redressing their grievances, which the hostile elements, supported by the US, India and Israeli do not want.

Moreover, malicious propaganda against the CPEC coincides with the terror attacks in various regions of Pakistan, particularly in the Balochistan.

In the recent past, blasts in Balochistan and the country’s other areas show that the US-led India, Afghanistan and Israel have again started acts of sabotage to destabilise Pakistan and to damage the CPEC through their intelligence agencies such as CIA, RAW, Mossad and Afghan NDS which are also supporting Balochistan’s separatist elements.

In this connection, Pakistan’s Ambassador to the UN Munir Akram handed over to the UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres a dossier on India’s campaign to promote terrorism in Pakistan.

Earlier, at a joint press conference Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Major-General Babar Iftikhar and Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi unveiled the dossier containing “irrefutable evidence” of India’s sponsorship of terrorism in Pakistan—also targeting the CPEC.

In a report on Tuesday, UNO verified Pakistan’s dossier.

At this juncture, the media of China and Pakistan must continue countering the disinformation about the CPEC.

Sajjad Shaukat
Sajjad Shaukat
Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations and can be reached at [email protected]

2 COMMENTS

  1. CPEC is a foolishness which put Pakistan in such a ‘Debt Trap’ which will be remembered by generations. China to deploy its Forex, first discuss BCIM (Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor) with India and its extension to Nepal, from Kunming to Kolkata to Gujarat) extendable farther to Karachi, Gwadar and Chabahar? BCIM connects China’s industrial hubs on its eastern coast passing via four nations and better industrial zones. It could also connect Nepal, Bhutan, South Pakistan and Iran with EU. This route is also better connected with rail links for economical transportation of goods both ways to and from Middle East/ Africa on one hand and China on other.

    However, China’s focus was only on deployment of its funds, job contracts and employment for its own labour which, for India was NOT financially beneficial. Remember famous Modi-Xi Meeting at Gujarat where China also offered $42b for bullet train project etc. India at that time declined the offer as it desired to complete the ICBM Indian lag by its own resources, labour and technology. Xi in the same trip also visited Pakistan when Nawaz Sharif mooted idea of CPEC which was never in original BRI documents. Please check Chinese BRI sites.

    CPEC is slowly having control over Pakistan as ‘East India Company’? Do you think Chinky’s would like to invest out of love for industrial infrastructure in Pakistan region? CPEC provide Chinkys, Pak market, investment, job contracts, strategic bases and tax concessions? If business and trade would have been consideration, for entire East Asian nations (including China), western Indian/ Southern Pakistani/ Iranian ports are more suitable under BCIM {like Jamnagar, Mumbai, Kandla, Surat and connectivity with Karachi, Gwadar and Chabahar} ? It connects Pakistan, Iran, China, India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Myanmar, Thailand and entire South East Asia.
    The road connectivity of Xinjiang-Gwadar (Via northern KPK/Baluchistan, is financially or economically NOT beneficial either for China or for Pakistan. Even the rout via Islamabad etc. is beneficial, only to China’s businesses and if they are getting tax concessions and are employing their own labor/ citizenry? Which Pakistan also eventually agreed? Please check all road/ dams/ health projects in northern part of Baluchistan/ KPK are funded only by IMF, EU or ADB and not by China. China’s desire to have Chinese labour upto 60% in Pak collaborations (and Pakistan agreeing to it) is proof of it.

    It is only Pakistan which is allowing Chinky’s to develop their colonies and enclosure on its land. China could not have such opportunity anywhere else, NEVER around Karachi-Gujarat-Kolkata-Dhaka-Yangoon-Kunming route or via Indian ports-Nepal/Bhutan-China etc. We have to understand that Chinese business houses’ interests in CPEC are basically:
    a) Connectivity to West Asia & Africa;
    b) Deployment of its forex with more returns;
    c) International presence for its businesses;
    d) Employment of its workforce overseas;
    e) Tax concessions for its businesses overseas; and
    f) Strategic interest if its relation with India deteriorates?
    Check that all of these are available to them only in CPEC and not in BCIM. Even the route of recent rail contract between Iran-China (Kashgar-Mashhad link) is missing Pakistan/ Afghanistan territory. Though the media & vested interests in Pakistan are jumping on CPEC, the GoP is conspicuously silent on it as Chinky making fool of them. GoP now being in debt-trap has lost backbone to stand against China. For Chinky’s Pakistan is now practically “China’s Autonomous Region of Pakistan”. This is similar to, as they think about Tibet, Xinxiang, Hongkong, Taiwan and what not?

    My dear Sajjad Shaukat, forget about Anpadh or interested rulers, it surprises me that even the Danishmand of Pakistan are also brain washed by Chinky’s to such an extent. Pathetic. 😏

  2. In reality CEPC Chinese Extended Paki Corridor is meant for constructing barren roads, barren projects for show casing, and converting Gwador into China Town with Naval bases and great boundary wall around chinese city from beggars of Pakistan being paid toll change in cents to paki youth? Pakistan Military they will have free naval support at Gwador don’t mind mortgaging entire setup for 99 years sooner than later? Bajwa may be given the post of Consular General of Pakistan a resident authority payed directly by Chinese in roubles?

Comments are closed.

Must Read

UK Conservatives suspend lawmaker who said Islamists control London’s mayor

LONDON: Britain’s Conservative Party suspended one of its lawmakers, Lee Anderson, on Saturday after he said the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, was under...

Wheat price