Indian general wants ISPR-like media wing

India’s cybersecurity chief on Saturday called for a need for a unified public relations command for all wings of the Indian armed forces purportedly to gain parity in the narrative warfare with Pak

News Desk

News Desk

December 21, 2019

2 min read
Indian general wants ISPR-like media wing

India’s cybersecurity chief on Saturday called for a need for a unified public relations command for all wings of the Indian armed forces purportedly to gain parity in the narrative warfare with Pakistan, which he said, has “got its act together” through it Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), reported India Today.

Indian National Cyber Security Coordinator Lieutenant General (r) Rajesh Pant said the three wings of the armed forces have their own public relations officers and “are going in different ways”.

“When are we going to have our own equivalent of the ISPR because the (Indian armed forces) services have their own PRs and they are going in different ways. Somebody at the national level now has to look at the narrative warfare and how to implement it in various domains,” he said.

In regard to Pakistan’s ISPR, General Pant said the neighbouring country got its act together in narrative warfare through the agency.

“What we are finding from the other side – from the western border – that since the time they have created the ISPR, they have got their act together,” he said here at a seminar on the topic of ‘Securing the Future Battlespace: Information and Space Warfare’.

Lt Gen (r) Rajesh Pant added, “When they (ISPR) conduct narrative warfare, let’s say in the case of Kashmir, the message they send to Europe is that human rights are being infringed.”

While when they engage with Islamic nations they tell them that Islam is under threat, noted Pant, adding, “What they told Southeast Asia is that there is a regional instability,” said Pant.

“So, they seem to have got their act together,” he concluded.

It is important to clarify what the three services of Indian armed forces imply and mean by ‘information warfare’, he said.

“They should come out with the definition because now they are using the terms – as you are aware – like ‘narrative warfare’,” he added.

Share:

Comments

Supports: **bold** *italic* [link](url) > quote @mention0/2000
Guest comments require moderation

No comments yet. Be the first to join the discussion!