PTI cries foul at ‘pre-planned’ delay in Iddat case verdict

ISLAMABAD: : Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) lawmakers on Wednesday deemed events leading to the delay in the announcement of the reserved verdict in the Iddat case as a “pre-planned” strategy

PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan, accompanied by other party leaders including Leader of the Opposition in the Senate Shibli Faraz and Member National Assembly (MNA) Ali Muhammad Khan, addressed the media outside the courtroom after today’s hearing.

Gohar said the court had initially scheduled to announce the verdict at 9 AM, but the timing was rescheduled to 10:30 AM due to the absence of the prosecutor.

Referring to remarks made by complainant Khawar Fareed Man­eka, former husband of Bushra Bibi, during today’s hearing, the lawmakers alleged that Maneka used abusive language against PTI founder Imran.

Furthermore, he claimed that the session judge, Justice Shahrukh Arjumand, had been “instructed” not to preside over the case.

Gohar added that Justice Arjumand had informed the court of his intention to report the matter to the higher court.

Following today’s events, the judge wrote to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) requesting the appeals to be transferred to another court.

Shibli Faraz also accused Maneka of verbally attacking ex-PM Imran and claimed that the case was intentionally delayed, asserting that it was “politically motivated”. “We are seeking justice from the courts,” added Faraz.

Echoing Faraz’s sentiments, Ali Muhammad Khan asserted that PTI supremo Imran was disrespected today in front of the court.

Referring to the sudden public holiday announced yesterday to commemorate Youm-e-Takbeer, Khan noted that the cypher case was supposed to be heard yesterday but was postponed due to the unprecedented holiday.

He claimed that like other cases involving Imran Khan, the Iddat case was also “baseless”.

“I want to ask [Khawar Maneka] why he chose to pursue the case after five years,” Khan added.

Earlier today, in a dramatic turn of events, the sessions judge hearing the Iddat case requested its transfer to another court without announcing the reserved judgment, which many believed would overturn the conviction of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi.

Judge Arjumand left the courtroom after the complainant expressed no confidence in him. The complainant emotionally argued his case, requesting 10 minutes to speak.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

Elite force ASI who shot down two lawyers in Attock over...

In a tragic incident in Attock's Kachhari district, two respected lawyers lost their lives on Saturday when an assistant sub-inspector from the elite forces,...