India’s #MeToo movement arrived in a cascade of allegations as women took to Twitter to call out comedians, journalists, authors, actors and filmmakers – in the process, they have sparked a debate about consent and complicity, BBC reported.
Unlike its American counterpart, it has not been spurred by investigative journalism. Rather, it has been a spontaneous outpouring in the last few days, amplified by journalists themselves. And it has hit Indian media the hardest.
It’s difficult to say what sparked the torrent of allegations. But it seems to have started on October 4 when a young female comedian accused Utsav Chakraborty, a 33-year-old comedian, of sending her an unsolicited photo of his penis. More allegations followed as other women replied to her tweet or she shared private messages they sent her (with their names blurred) – they said he had either sent them photos of his penis or asked them for naked photos of themselves.
Chakraborty, who admitted to the accusation in a series of tweets, apologised the next day. By then, more women, many of them journalists, had begun to share stories of sexual harassment and even assault.
In the next three days, as more comedians, senior reporters, editors, popular authors, actors and filmmakers were “outed”, the hashtag #MeToo was trending in India. The scores of tweets – in the form of long “threads” and screenshots of incriminating conversations – have set off a debate about what constitutes harassment, complicity and consent.
This is not the first time alleged harassers have been publicly named and shamed in India – in 2017, a law student published a controversial crowdsourced list on Facebook accusing more than 50 professors. But this time, most of the accusers are not anonymous. And those that have chosen to remain anonymous are not alone in their accusations.
THE MEDIA INDUSTRY:
Women journalists have perhaps played the biggest role so far, “outing” reporters, senior editors, authors and even a high court judge. And it’s likely the coming week will bring fresh accusations.
The allegations have made it to the front page of national dailies, forcing newsrooms to not just take notice but also respond. At least one major newspaper has promised an investigation after seven women accused one of its senior editors of sexually harassing them and of sabotaging their careers if they did not comply; another newspaper announced that a senior editor who had been named was stepping down from his role.
“There were whispers all along in the newsrooms of misconduct by senior editorial colleagues who used their positions of power and influence to proposition and harass young women, but now some of it’s being articulated in the open,” says the BBC’s Geeta Pandey.
Journalist Sandhya Menon, who has called out two senior editors for allegedly sexually harassing her, has shared numerous stories of harassment and assault from other women – many of whom messaged her privately.
Since then, many more women have come forward with their stories, some of them from years ago. This is perhaps a sign of how, for the first time, they believe people are listening.
“They are using their words, smartphones and laptops to speak their truth and be heard,” says Supreme Court lawyer Karuna Nundy.
She said it was a form of “civil disobedience” because, having lost faith in the justice of public institutions, they were making use of the tools available to them.
India’s film industry has hovered on the edges of #MeToo for some time. In September, a 10-year-old allegation by actress Tanushree Dutta against veteran actor Nana Patekar once again made headlines but, for the first time, it attracted the attention of several people in the film industry. Patekar repeated his denial of the allegations over the weekend, calling them “a lie”.
Then on October 6 HuffPost India published a months-long investigation alleging that director Vikas Bahl had sexually assaulted a female crew member in 2015. It also alleged that his business partners, including acclaimed director, Anurag Kashyap, knew about the allegation but took no action against Bahl.
Bahl, who denied the allegation after it first surfaced, has not commented publicly since the HuffPost story on Saturday.
While actresses have spoken out before they often did not name their harasser or their allegations did not become part of a larger movement. Although the accuser remains anonymous, this is the first time such an allegation has been made public in Bollywood.
It has also been corroborated by Kashyap, who has issued an apology, vowing that something like this will “never happen again” on his “work premises”. This is no minor development in an industry which has long been criticised for exploiting women both on the screen and off it.
Phantom, the production house set up by Kashyap, Bahl and two others, was dissolved on October 6. It produced the Netflix show Sacred Games along with several Bollywood films.
The alleged victim had not wanted to speak out until now, Kashyap said, so the company had not acted sooner. “Now in hindsight and after taking stock of things myself, I can quite see how I was ill-advised.”
COMPLICITY AND CONSENT:
The allegations have ranged from awkward or creepy encounters, lewd behaviour and suggestive text messages to aggressive sexual advances and outright assault. This has prompted some women to ask others to use caution before calling someone out on Twitter for something “trivial”.
But this has also invited criticism from other women who have argued in favour of a stricter definition of consent. Some have said this is a moment to listen, sift through stories and introspect rather than tell women how they should process what happened to them.
Those who were allegedly complicit have also not been spared the naming and shaming. Chakraborty, for instance, had appeared in videos by India’s most popular comedy group, All India Bakchod (AIB). Co-founder Tanmay Bhatt, who admitted to the charge that he knew about the alleged incident, has stepped down from his role as CEO.
Since then, a film produced by AIB has been dropped from the prestigious Mumbai film festival while a third season of a television show featuring the group was cancelled by popular Indian streaming website Hotstar.
And the allegations of complicity have also unleashed a public reckoning.
The floodgates have opened and what’s coming out is predictably murky.
Many are describing it as Indian journalism’s #MeToo moment, but could it really be as potent as the movement that brought down some of the most powerful men of Hollywood? The names that have been outed, barring one or two, are of relatively small fry – the “Harvey Weinsteins” remain unnamed as yet.
The strength of the latest #MeToo movement will ultimately be tested by where it travels from here – and if the past is any indication, there’s not much to be optimistic about, for earlier attempts at an Indian #MeToo did not have any lasting impact.
A list of alleged predators in academia died a quick death in the Twitter bubble; and calls to name and shame the sleazy in Bollywood did not find many takers. Also, it’s not going to be easy for those who choose to speak out, especially for those who have no evidence to back up their allegations.
Some of the women have provided screen shots of private text messages they were sent by their alleged harassers, making the allegations hard to deny.
But in cases where it boils down to “your word against mine”, many of the women who spoke out are already being threatened with legal action for defamation and some of the tweets, naming names, have already been taken down.