HEC reluctant in deciding fate of executive director: report | Pakistan Today

HEC reluctant in deciding fate of executive director: report

ISLAMABAD: The Higher Education Commission (HEC) is supposedly reluctant to decide the fate of its executive director (ED) who had been caught of plagiarising his research papers, a leading English daily has reported.

Two months ago, it was reported that more than 50 per cent of a research paper written by one of the HEC’s EDs, Arshad Ali, was copied.

The research paper, published in July 2004, was seen as a copy of a similar paper authored by Chaitanya Kandagatla from the University of Texas in America, which was published in February 2004.

Since then the HEC top management has not been able to decide what to do about the ED who has become a disgrace for the higher education body which professes ‘zero tolerance’ for such cases when they emerge from other universities.

According to sources, the HEC has held about five meetings, including one of a special committee to look into the ED’s case.

“This is a clear case of plagiarism but we do not know why the HEC chairperson is not taking an action,” said a source, adding that he might be worried about the hype after the ED’s removal.

HEC chairperson Dr Mukhtar Ahmed has also admitted that plagiarism had been found in the research paper and that the “needless delay is becoming an embarrassment for the commission”.

“Yes the committee has concluded that there was plagiarism,” he said.

The case has become the centre of discussion and officials in the HEC are looking to either the removal of the ED or his resignation. However, it was reported that when the chairperson went to the ED to talk about his resignation, the latter rejected the idea and started a heated argument with his boss.

The chairperson has denied that any such event took place.

According to a source, Director General Finance Ghulam Nabi also had an argument with the ED last week. “He [Nabi] insulted him in his office and told him to step down for what he has done,” he said, adding that Nabi later apologised for his misbehaviour.

Another source confirmed that the annual review committee had also recommended not to extend the tenure of the ED next year. The plagiarism was committed in 2004 when the HEC plagiarism policy was not in place. The current plagiarism policy was bought through an act in 2007.

According to the HEC’s plagiarism policy, if an act of plagiarism has been committed prior to 2007, all the benefits will be taken from the accused, including withdrawal of the paper from the journal and cancellation of the degree, if applicable.

Former HEC chairperson Javed Laghari and International Islamic University Islamabad’s current rector Masoom Yasinzai have also been charged under the same law as they were found guilty of plagiarism prior to 2007.

Dr Ahmed seemed confused when asked about the case being dragged for no reason. “We want to fulfil all legal aspects of the matter to avert any glitch in the future,” he said, adding that the HEC had zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

The Ministry of Education and Professional Trainings on Saturday published an ad announcing the vacancy of HEC chairperson as the tenure of the current one is going to expire on April 15. The applications have been invited till March 25.

Related posts