Pakistan renews proposal for a bilateral nuclear-test ban | Pakistan Today

Pakistan renews proposal for a bilateral nuclear-test ban

  • Ambassador Amil cites growing mistrust, insatiable desire for military dominance on part of few countries

GENEVA/ISLAMABAD: Reaffirming commitment to promote peace and stability in South Asia, Pakistan’s permanent representative to United Nations in Geneva Ambassador Farukh Amil has renewed his country’s proposal for a bilateral arrangement on a nuclear-test-ban in the region.

Speaking in the UN General Assembly’s main committee, he cited growing mistrust and insatiable desire for military dominance on the part of a few countries as factors threatening regional and international security, and said that Islamabad’s security policy was defined by restraint, responsibility and avoidance of the arms race.

Despite the lack of any favourable response, Ambassador Amil said that Pakistan had told the 193-member assembly last year that it was ready to work towards a nuclear-test ban in South Asia. “We renew our commitment towards this proposal,” he added.

“Our proposal for a strategic restraint regime in South Asia based on reciprocal measures for nuclear and missile restraint and instituting a balance between conventional forces, also remains on the table,” the envoy said while addressing the First Committee, which deals with disarmament and international security matters.

Turning to the deadlock in the Conference on Disarmament (CD), Ambassador Amil said that the proposals of adding additional non-proliferation measures to its agenda were being driven by the self-serving interests of certain states. Such actions were divisive and not going to work, he said.

Expressing understanding of the initiative for banning nuclear weapons on humanitarian and ethical grounds, he said that such arms cannot be eliminated without addressing the concerns of the states that rely on them for their security. The Conference on Disarmament was the forum for negotiations on a universal, non-discriminatory nuclear weapons convention, negative security assurances and on the peaceful use of outer space.

The substantive work on a Fissile Material Cut-off Treat must be undertaken in the CD on the basis of a universally accepted mandate that explicitly addresses the asymmetries in existing fissile material stocks, he said, noting Pakistan’s detailed proposal in this regard remains on the table.

“We need to reconsider the negative effects on the treaty’s prospects generated by the misguided exercise of double standards, manifest in the conclusion of discriminatory bilateral civil nuclear cooperation agreements, the grant of inequitable waivers, and the continued pursuit of the creation of additional country-specific exceptions in multilateral export control regimes.”

Pakistan was a mainstream partner in global efforts to secure export controls and had fulfilled all requirements of Security Council resolution 1540 (2004), he said. A party to both the conventions covering chemical and biological weapons, Pakistan valued those instruments and was interested in strengthening both those regimes.

Related posts


  1. Pingback: Pakistan renews proposal for a bilateral nuclear-test ban | Bakhabar

  2. Adi said:

    Pakistan needs balance with Afghanistan… India will make sure Pak and Afghan are balanced

  3. Zoona said:

    Pakistan is a country which is very much in favor of and supports the non proliferation efforts. Thats why it has always been at forefront at many international forums of non proliferation initiatives. In order to maintain peace and stability in the region and also to make the possibility of the use of nuclear weapons almost zero Pakistan no of times have offered India with nuclear test ban proposals but India being arrogant and aggressive in its policies always refused to accept the proposal. The road to the twin goals of nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament goes through a universal ratification of the CTBT. There is a strong need for global sincere efforts in oredr to pursue the goals of CTBt and disarmament.

Comments are closed.