Military officials admit defector’s key role in Bin Laden operation | Pakistan Today

Military officials admit defector’s key role in Bin Laden operation

Two former senior military officials said on Tuesday that a ‘defector’ from country’s intelligence agency did assist the US in its hunt for Osama bin Laden but denied the two countries had officially worked together.

The officials’ accounts came after the publication of a controversial news report by US journalist Seymour Hersh in which he claimed to have uncovered a ‘secret deal’ between Washington and Islamabad that reportedly resulted in the killing of al Qaeda chief in 2011.

The White House has flatly rejected Hersh’s claims that Pakistan was told in advance about the May 2 special forces raid in Abbottabad.

A source — who was a serving senior military official at the time of the raid — told AFP that the defector was a “resourceful and energetic” mid-ranking intelligence officer whose efforts were critical to the operation’s success.

Hersh’s report quoted a senior US source as saying a “walk-in” approached the then-Islamabad station chief for the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in 2010 promising to lead them to bin Laden, who according to the journalist had been imprisoned by Pakistani authorities at the Abbottabad compound since 2006.

However, the Pakistani military source told AFP the defector had no knowledge that his target was bin Laden, but he was instead given a task that would help verify the al Qaeda chief’s identity.

The source declined to elaborate on what that task was, but a Pakistani investigation found that the CIA had run a fake vaccination programme with the help of physician Shakeel Afridi who obtained DNA samples.

Qazi Khalilullah, Pakistan’s foreign ministry spokesman, meanwhile said the government was investigating Hersh’s account and would announce its reaction soon. “We are looking into the matter and will give our reaction soon,” he said.

Verification task:

On the defector’s role, the source said: “This guy was inducted at a much later stage only to carry out the ground confirmation. “He added that the defector did not belong to the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) but another branch, and was now residing in the United States.

Another former official, ex-ISI chief Hamid Gul, told AFP he was also aware of the defector. “That is in my knowledge, that someone defected,” he said.

“There was too big a reward, he became a mole and agent to put in practice their plan.” The US had placed a $25-million-dollar bounty on information leading to the capture or killing of bin Laden — a sum Washington has said it never paid because no human informants were used.

According to Hersh’s report, the US learned that Pakistani authorities had bin Laden in their custody and were hoping to use him as a shield against Al-Qaeda and Taliban attacks.

Later, Hersh reported, the US convinced Pakistan to stage a fake raid to kill bin Laden, providing a boost for US President Barack Obama — then in his first term — while also allowing the Pakistanis to deny having anything to do with the killing.

No deal made:

Both former Pakistani officials, however, and several other serving officials, have dismissed the allegation that such a deal had been brokered.

The then-serving senior military official said that in the aftermath of the raid, “the mood here and the reaction here was of great frustration even at the top level.

“If the top guys had been part of the plan — they were the worst hit. They were almost forced to resign.

“With the kind of bad name and reputation that came with such a great risk, it wasn’t worth it. “A leaked Pakistani government report in 2013 said bin Laden arrived in Pakistan in the spring or summer of 2002 — after the 2001 US-led invasion of Afghanistan — and settled in Abbottabad in August 2005.

The report, which coined the term “governance implosion syndrome” to explain the extent of official failures to detect him, said he was once stopped for speeding and enjoyed wearing a cowboy hat.

Hersh’s report has been met with some scepticism, but Dawn’s editorial argued that it should force the government to officially release the findings of the 2013 investigation, and bring the country’s powerful military-run intelligence agencies under civilian supervision.



Related posts

4 Comments

  1. imran ali said:

    it was major(DR) who took the DNA sample…Dr.Afridi was made scape goat and hatred was created against vaccination as a result we lost so many polio workers

  2. aryanazlam said:

    These are all conjectures and surmises.

  3. Munir Varraich said:

    The timing of publishing this Hersh's report is interesting.

    Dawn’s editorial argued : that "it should force the government to officially release the findings of the 2013 investigation", and

    "bring the country’s powerful military-run intelligence agencies under civilian supervision." That is an echo from the past, the futile effort by PPPs Rehman Malik, Zardari's most trusted Interior Minister.

    So essentially the "reason" of publishing this report at this time in the American and Pakistani media still remains the same. To put Pakistan Army and the ISI in an embarrassing position.

    Why this demand from Dawn at this juncture.

    Some obvious questions which come to mind:

    1) Is it because Pakistan Army did not respond "positively" to Saudi's monarchy,

    2) Is it that the army has been successful in the war against terrorists?

    3) Is it that MQM has been put in a tight corner and their "friends" in the west want to ease the pressure by this means.

    4) Is it that the presence of DG(ISI) in the meeting between Asif Zardari and President Ghani of Afghanistan or the presence of Army Chief in the meeting between the Pakistan's Prime Minister and President Ghani.

    5) Or is it an effort by the "democrats" in the west to create a wedge between the military collaboration of Pakistan and China, and provide a support to "civilian rulers", especially on the subject of Gwadar Port. At least Dawn has suggested so.

    This is typical Seymour style – to create waves. In America his agenda is understandable. But whose agenda is he following and who is to gain from this act of his in Pakistan?

    MAV

Comments are closed.

Top