Govt likely to proceed with treason case against Musharraf | Pakistan Today

Govt likely to proceed with treason case against Musharraf

The government has decided to let the former General (r) Pervez Musharraf face Article 6 of the Constitution for abrogating the Constitution on November 3, 2007.

A federal minister, on condition of anonymity told local media on Thursday that in the Supreme Court treason case the government would support upholding the Constitution and the rule of law instead of saving the dictator from trial on high treason charges.

A few days back, the newly-appointed Attorney General Munir A Malik met Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to decide on government’s stance on the issue of Musharraf’s trial under Article 6 of the Constitution.

Former Attorney General Irfan Qadir, while representing the caretaker government, had submitted a statement saying that the interim government was not interested in prosecuting the former military dictator. He had further contended that now was the time to ascertain the view of the newly-elected government in the case.

In its last hearing of the case, the Supreme Court had made it clear that it would implement the Article 6 of the Constitution in the Pervez Musharraf treason case come what may.

The three-member bench of the apex court comprising Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja, Justice Khilji Arif Hussain and Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan hearing the case had also observed that hearing into the case would be decided in accordance with the law.

The Nawaz Sharif government, the minister said, would assure that the decision of the apex court in the case would be implemented by the government. Under the law, the secretary interior has to lodge a complaint against Musharraf under the Article 6 of the Constitution read with High Treason (Punishment) Act 1973 for subverting or abrogating the Constitution.

The caretaker government of Mir Hazar Khan Khoso was asked by the court to proceed in the case in line with the Constitution but it had flatly refused to initiate the treason trial of Musharraf, contending before the Supreme Court that it was beyond the caretaker government’s mandate to take any ‘controversial’ step.

In a statement read out before the three-member bench, the interim government in the third week of April last had noted that fewer than three weeks were left to the elections, and overseeing the vote was a full-time job, given the threat level against the candidates.

On this cold response of the caretakers, the bench head Justice Jawwad S Khawaja said: “The Federation had taken no action in the past and today (April 22) it has been revealed that no legal action will be taken against the former Chief of Army Staff in the future as well.”

The caretaker government’s refusal though gave a temporary breathing space to Musharraf who is already under house arrest in connection with different criminal cases pending against him before different courts. Nonetheless the former dictator is now in serious danger of becoming the first-ever dictator in the country’s history to have faced trial under Article 6 of the Constitution.

Related posts


  1. khalid jan said:

    if such bolds steps were taken, then no one will dare to abrogate the law

  2. DualNational said:

    How about October 1999? Why are the judges not talking about that? If they truly want to implement article 6 then all the judges who took oath under the 1999 PCO, including intikhar chaudry, would be found guilty. This is selective justice. Justice is blind but in this case justice is (visually) impaired.

Comments are closed.